As the United States struggles toward a ideas of universal condition care, many have looked at the Canadian condition care ideas as a model. Only a few have looked toward France. That’s a mistake for at least 2 reasons.
First, according to the World condition society (Who), France has the best condition care ideas in the world . It has been widely reported that the Who found the French ideas to be amount 1 while the Canadian ideas is amount 30 and the U.S. amount 37.
It should be noted here that the Who rankings truly consist of manifold rankings and the numbers generally quoted are the ranking based on the quantum that the Who calls the Op ranking. Op is said to quantum “overall performance” adjusted to reflect a country’s performance based on how well it theoretically could have performed. When reporting the rankings of 1 for France, 30 for Canada and 37 for the United States, it is the Op ranking being used.
Why did the French ideas do so well in the Who rankings? The French ideas excels in 4 areas:
It provides universal coverage
It has responsive condition care providers
Patients have free time of choice
The condition and longevity of the population
Second, we should be seeing more closely at the French ideas because it has more similarities with the U.S. ideas than whether the Canadian or British system. Many Americans assume that the French ideas is like the ideas in Britain. Nothing could be further from the truth or more insulting to the French.
Exactly like the United States, the French ideas relies on both private assurance and government insurance. Also, just like in America, population generally get their assurance straight through their employer. What is distinct is that everyone in France has condition insurance. Every legal resident of France has entrance to condition care under the law of universal coverage called la Couverture maladie universelle.
Under the French system, condition assurance is a subject of public safety or the Sécurité Sociale. The ideas is funded primarily by taxing the salaries of workers. An worker in France will pay about 20% of their salary to fund the Sécurité Sociale. These taxes represent about 60% of the cost of the condition assurance plan.
The equilibrium of the funding comes from the self employed, who pay more than salaried workers, and by indirect taxes on alcohol and tobacco. Finally, further taxes are levied against other income, both direct and indirect.
The French share the same distaste for restrictions on outpatient selection as American do. The French ideas relies on autonomous private practitioners rather than a British-style national condition service. The French are very dismissive of the British ideas which they call “socialized medicine.” Virtually all physicians in France partake in the nation’s public condition insurance, Sécurité Sociale.
Perhaps it’s time for us to take a closer look at French ideas about condition care reform.